Oncology · research prototype

Anticancer treatment / between visits

Remote oncology monitoring —
over time.

A research system for observing symptoms and patient dynamics during outpatient cancer treatment, combining ePROs, wearable devices and professional review of prespecified signals.

Not a medical service. Does not diagnose, change anticancer treatment or replace the oncology team.

Demo stream
Synthetic data
A
Participant A-014Day 12 · outpatient treatment
Stable
Heart rate72 bpm
Activity3,680 steps
Sleep6:42 h:min
Wellbeing7 / 10
!
Review signalActivity below personal baseline for two days
Not a diagnosis
DeviceContextRuleProfessional
01 / Need

Why it matters

Symptoms and treatment tolerance may change between visits.

Wearable data do not replace the patient’s report. The research pathway connects ePRO symptoms with activity, sleep and heart-rate trends, then sends a prespecified signal to the responsible team for human review.

Oncology and evidence

Understand the technology before a pilot.

Independent English pages cover symptom monitoring, wearable measures, evidence limits and research design.

Scientific context

Evidence exists, but it is not interchangeable.

Randomised evidence exists for electronic symptom monitoring. Much wearable oncology research still focuses on feasibility, correlations and data quality. The project keeps these layers separate and makes no clinical-effect claim before its own study.

Methods and sources →
1,191PRO-TECT participants

No overall-survival difference; fewer emergency visits were reported for the monitored group.

PubMed ↗
112wearable oncology publications

Most assessed feasibility or associations rather than outcome change.

PubMed ↗
ResidentSirius University of Science and Technology

Project operator

NPO Scientific Technologies LLC is a Sirius resident.

Participant status was obtained on 16 May 2025. It belongs to the legal entity and does not establish clinical validation or medical-device registration.

Official source ↗

Monitoring pathway

A signal is not a decision.

Each step is auditable. The protocol sets the threshold and escalation route; an authorised professional remains responsible for any clinical action.

01

Device and ePRO

Passive measures are paired with brief patient reports of symptoms.

02

Personal context

Trends are considered against an individual baseline, not a universal norm.

03
±

Prespecified rule

The protocol defines the window, threshold and priority.

04

Professional review

The team reviews context, contacts the patient and documents action.

Current boundary

Research prototype.
Not a medical service.

Available

Interface concept

Synthetic stream, roles, signal pathway and legal information.

Before a pilot

Separate validation

Protocol, ethics, devices, integrations and security review.

Not connected

Real patient data

The website accepts no medical records, device feeds or patient questionnaires.

Not performed

Autonomous decisions

No diagnosis, prescription, treatment change or automatic emergency response.

Key questions

Frequently asked

Is remote oncology monitoring currently available?

No. This is a research prototype with synthetic data; enrolment and device connection are not open.

Does the system diagnose or tell a patient what to do?

No. It is designed to surface a change for professional review, not to issue treatment advice.

Which wearable devices are supported?

No device has been selected. Documentation, data quality, intended use and regulatory status must be assessed for each protocol.

Can a clinic discuss a research pilot?

Yes, at protocol-design level and without sending patient data through this website or ordinary email.