← Home

Symptoms between visits

ePRO in oncology: electronic symptom monitoring

ePROs capture the patient’s own report of symptoms, function and quality of life. Value comes from a closed pathway: a regular report, a meaningful threshold, a notification to the responsible team and a documented response.

Audience
For oncologists, researchers and patient-support teams
Status
Research information, not medical advice
Editorial
NPO NT project team; scientific concept by Dr Artem Poltoratskiy
Review
No independent external medical review of this edition is claimed
Updated
Reviewed 19 August 2026
01

What ePRO measures

The patient is the primary source for the severity and impact of many symptoms. Wearable activity or heart rate does not replace a report of pain, nausea, fatigue or day-to-day function.

02

What trials tell us

In PRO-TECT, 1,191 people with metastatic cancer reported symptoms weekly and severe or worsening responses notified the care team. Overall survival did not differ, while the first emergency visit occurred later and the mean number of emergency visits was lower. These findings belong to that intervention and cannot validate every ePRO product.

03

Combining ePRO and wearable data

Passive trends may add context or prompt a question, but the protocol must define the data, missingness, signal rule and accountable reviewer before collection begins.