← Home

Technology without overclaiming

Wearable devices in oncology

A wearable may add continuity to observation, but a consumer metric does not automatically become a clinical fact. Meaning depends on the device, population, treatment context and the pathway used to review change.

Audience
For cancer researchers and digital-health teams
Status
Research information, not medical advice
Editorial
NPO NT project team; scientific concept by Dr Artem Poltoratskiy
Review
No independent external medical review of this edition is claimed
Updated
Reviewed 19 August 2026
01

Potential data

Depending on the model, devices may provide activity, heart rate, heart-rate variability, sleep, temperature or other measures. Each field must be checked against the device documentation and the intended research use.

02

Important limitations

  • Non-wear, charging and synchronisation gaps can distort a time series.
  • Accuracy and proprietary algorithms differ by device and firmware.
  • A deviation from personal baseline does not establish its cause.
  • Regulatory status and intended medical purpose require a separate assessment.
03

A defensible protocol

Record the device and version, measured property, missing-data rules, feature algorithm, escalation rule and the person responsible for reviewing a signal. Reassess the pathway when the device or algorithm changes.